English Lang. & Lit. Blog | Tómas Egilsson

The personal history of an author can have a significant influence on the way meaning is constructed in his/her writing. Comment on specific instances of such influence in Things Fall Apart. Chinua Achebe wrote the novel 'Things Fall Apart' in 1958, two years before the independence of Nigeria, and was a devoted member of the Nigerian independence movement. Although the British did take Nigeria for themselves by destroying the previous culture, and despite his role in the independence movement, Achebe does his best to equal the playing field, and refrains from writing the British as these monsters who ruined the utopia that was Umuofia. The reason for this is because of his personal history, living as a devoted Christian but also a proud Igbo. He uses this complex personal history to help influence meaning in his novel and therefore creates characters that are imperfect, helping to create a balance between the two sides in the novel.

What is the significance of Okonkwo’s character? What does he represent or is symbolic of? He is symbolic of everything that the Umuofian society stands for. He is materialistic, and loves being successful. He aspires to reach to top ranks of his society, and is determined to achieve his goals. He is hard working, strong, and brave, everything that a man should be in his society. He does not follow in the footsteps of his father but rather deviates from him and will do anything to not end up like him. His society does not believe in a man that benefits from his own father's success but rather must build his own success. He is significant in that he is considered important within his society. He is well known and someone that the young men of Umuofia should aspire to be like. However, he is also human. He deals with a lot of internal conflict, mainly centered around the fact that he will do anything to not be like his father which has it's downsides. His father was a very lo...

1. When Okonkwo beheads the messenger: This is a very important moment in terms of Okonkwo's character. Throughout the novel, we see him deal with a lot of internal conflict, which is then amplified when he returns from his exile to see that his village has changed tremendously and has been taken over by the British. After his arrival, his internal conflict builds up more and more, until it finally reaches the climax, and he kills the messenger. 2. Okonkwo kills Ikemefuna: This event foreshadows Okonkwo's eventual downfall, and acts as a turning point in the story. During the event, Ikemefuna calls Okonkwo his "father", showcasing how strong the relationship they have formed is. Okonkwo is forced to kill Ikemefuna out of fear that he will be considered weak if he does not do so, and this act leaves a huge emotional scar in him. 3. Okonkwo hangs himself: After he beheads the messenger, the villagers decide not to defend Okonkwo from the British, another example...

Things Fall Apart, the novel by Chinua Achebe follows the story of Okonkwo, an Igbo tribesman who is forced to deal with a shift in culture and ideals as white colonials come to take over the country. The first part of the novel focuses on introducing us to the Igbo culture, what it entails, how is society functions, and what is considered important in their culture. He spends a lot of time doing this and puts lot of detail and imagery into his descriptions. So, by doing this, we develop a lot of respect for their culture as we have a good understanding of it. Then, in the second part of the novel, the white colonials come and try to take over the country. Their attempts include introducing them to Christianity and telling the locals that their religion and gods aren’t real. They would also interfere with their traditions, which are very important to their society. Now, if Achebe had decided to start the novel during the context of composition, we would not have as strong of a conne...

https://youtu.be/zMOuW21QZHU

Power as a word has a lot of different connotations to it, and can mean many different things depending on the context it is used in and who is actually using the word. In terms of politics, it can be used to describe someone who has a lot of control over a state or government, or maybe is very influential in the way they act and speak. It can also be associated with raw, physical strength, and being able to exert a lot of force onto something or someone. When bringing this word into the William Shakespeare play 'Coriolanus', the word has the same flexibility. Some consider the play to be set in two worlds. One being set in the politically charged city of Rome, and the other being the battlefield. In order to prevail in this historical context, one had to have both the political power of being an influential speaker, and the raw physical strength on the battlefield. Cominius had both of these, and therefore was a Consul before the play took place. However, times are changing. ...

Throughout Act I of Coriolanus, Shakespeare aims to characterize Caius Martius. Not only does he do this through the words and actions of Martius himself, but also his friends, family, and enemies. Scene I characterizes Caius as a mean and egotistical brute, that the commonalty hate. They showcase this by stating that "Caius Martius is chief enemy to the people," in the first few lines of the play. Then when he himself enters, this statement is justified when he calls the citizens "dissentious rogues," and to "hang 'em!" which helps the audience understand why he is considered an enemy. This hatred is then furthered by Aufidius, his biggest rival and enemy saying in a letter he received that "Martius your old enemy, Who is of Rome worse hated than of you." This really solidifies the citizens opinions, stating that the man fighting against their country at war is less hated than their own general. This also establishes the conflict between Au...